CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
support.apple.com
CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
1–10 of 124 posts
Re: CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
#2[deleted]
Re: CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
#3Kernel
Available for: macOS Tahoe
Impact: An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination
Description: An integer overflow was addressed with improved input validation.
CVE-2026-28952: Calif.io in collaboration with Claude and Anthropic Research
Re: CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
#4It's funny how in the past a server uptime used to be a kind of badge of honor, while now a computer running for more than a week is a massive security risk.
I've had to be on top of updating everything constantly lately.
Re: CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
#5Claude and Anthropic is mentioned, but not Mythos, I'm guessing this would mean then this was found outside of the whole Mythos thing, or would there be any reason for them not to mention it, if it was involved?
Re: CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
#6Where all of this is going? Will there be a dedicated servers running coding agents that iterate throught codebases for each company to find vulnerabilities 24/7?
Re: CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
#7Where all of this is going? Will there be a dedicated servers running coding agents that iterate throught codebases for each company to find vulnerabilities 24/7?
Yes
Re: CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
#8One more reason to avoid upgrading to Tahoe.
Re: CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude
#9For many years my go-to plan has been to stay one point release behind apple's releases, especially the .0 releases -- but, times change. Last night I pushed the button for 26.5, thinking about the Glasswing/Mythos reporting. Seems like staying on bleeding edge is going to be the name of the game.
I wonder if this will change general dynamics -- feels like LTS releases could become even more important, at the same time having reduced maintenance costs since you can have some agentic help on backporting.