Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
1–10 of 171 posts
Re: Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
#2Antigravity may well Top the whatever benchmark but:
My Antigravity (forced) replacement for Gemini CLI requires me to log on via browser every time I use it, and my Antigravity IDE won't update at all, so:
If it's ok I'd prefer they just work on reaching a baseline acceptable rollout before worrying about being Top in anything.
Ps actual title:
OpenSCAD LLM Benchmark: Building the Pantheon
Re: Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
#3Antigravity may well Top the whatever benchmark but: My Antigravity (forced) replacement for Gemini CLI requires me to log on via browser every time I use it, and my Antigravity IDE won't update at all, so: If it's ok I'd prefer they just work on reaching a baseline acceptable rollout before worrying about being Top in anything. Ps actual title: OpenSCAD LLM Benchmark: Building the Pantheon
I just use Claude Code and intellij, so I don't understand why so many people complain about Antigravity ditching VS Code, what's the surface not covered by using Antigravity CLI + VS Code (or any other IDE)?
Re: Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
#4The only thing faster moving that AI these days are the goalposts. Three years ago we would have been amazed if models were able to produce anything, now we have the luxury of nitpicking. Even the worst entries in the benchmark are quite impressive.
Re: Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
#5Antigravity may well Top the whatever benchmark but: My Antigravity (forced) replacement for Gemini CLI requires me to log on via browser every time I use it, and my Antigravity IDE won't update at all, so: If it's ok I'd prefer they just work on reaching a baseline acceptable rollout before worrying about being Top in anything. Ps actual title: OpenSCAD LLM Benchmark: Building the Pantheon
Having my workflow disrupted is the main reason I never adopted Antigravity, despite liking it. I'm glad to see G is invested, but the older I get the more protective I am of my workflow.
Re: Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
#6Antigravity may well Top the whatever benchmark but: My Antigravity (forced) replacement for Gemini CLI requires me to log on via browser every time I use it, and my Antigravity IDE won't update at all, so: If it's ok I'd prefer they just work on reaching a baseline acceptable rollout before worrying about being Top in anything. Ps actual title: OpenSCAD LLM Benchmark: Building the Pantheon
I just use Claude Code and intellij, so I don't understand why so many people complain about Antigravity ditching VS Code, what's the surface not covered by using Antigravity CLI + VS Code (or any other IDE)?
I'm not GP, but I am somewhat excited about antigravity CLI. I adopted Gemini CLI early and really liked it, though over time it got dumber and dumber until a point when I realized it was foolish to use it instead of claude/codex. I'm hopefuly that antigravity CLI won't go through that path, but also can't fight a skepticism.
Re: Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
#7The only thing faster moving that AI these days are the goalposts. Three years ago we would have been amazed if models were able to produce anything, now we have the luxury of nitpicking. Even the worst entries in the benchmark are quite impressive.
Things mature, and expectations grow appropriately. That is true of more than just LLM performance.
Re: Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
#8Antigravity may well Top the whatever benchmark but: My Antigravity (forced) replacement for Gemini CLI requires me to log on via browser every time I use it, and my Antigravity IDE won't update at all, so: If it's ok I'd prefer they just work on reaching a baseline acceptable rollout before worrying about being Top in anything. Ps actual title: OpenSCAD LLM Benchmark: Building the Pantheon
I agree, my main concern regarding Google AI products is this endless pain around the UX of login / billing / upgrades / product sunsets... but their LLM models are good and Antigravity 2.0 is not that bad either (unless you lost all you Antigravity 1.0 setup and projects - like many people did)
Re: Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
#9Next month they'll be beaten again.
And next year Google will probably sunset Antigravity.
If it doesn't make Google billions, don't trust them.
Re: Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark
#10Next month they'll be beaten again. And next year Google will probably sunset Antigravity. If it doesn't make Google billions, don't trust them.
Plenty of google products dont make billions and they are still alive