Show HN: ANML – A machine-first markup language for the agentic web (IETF Draft)
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Show HN: ANML – A machine-first markup language for the agentic web (IETF Draft)
#2Re: Show HN: ANML – A machine-first markup language for the agentic web (IETF Draft)
#3It's not an IETF draft. Those are named draft-ietf-*.
You're lying by omission ("individual submission"). Stop.
Re: Show HN: ANML – A machine-first markup language for the agentic web (IETF Draft)
#4It's in the format of an "IETF Draft" and has been uploaded on the IETF datatracker web form as an individual submission. It doesn't even name a working group it's targeting for adoption. It's not an IETF draft. Those are named draft-ietf-*. You're lying by omission ("individual submission"). Stop.
Re: Show HN: ANML – A machine-first markup language for the agentic web (IETF Draft)
#5It's in the format of an "IETF Draft" and has been uploaded on the IETF datatracker web form as an individual submission. It doesn't even name a working group it's targeting for adoption. It's not an IETF draft. Those are named draft-ietf-*. You're lying by omission ("individual submission"). Stop.
Thanks for your "constructive" feedback, have a great day!
Re: Show HN: ANML – A machine-first markup language for the agentic web (IETF Draft)
#6It's in the format of an "IETF Draft" and has been uploaded on the IETF datatracker web form as an individual submission. It doesn't even name a working group it's targeting for adoption. It's not an IETF draft. Those are named draft-ietf-*. You're lying by omission ("individual submission"). Stop.
Re: Show HN: ANML – A machine-first markup language for the agentic web (IETF Draft)
#7It's in the format of an "IETF Draft" and has been uploaded on the IETF datatracker web form as an individual submission. It doesn't even name a working group it's targeting for adoption. It's not an IETF draft. Those are named draft-ietf-*. You're lying by omission ("individual submission"). Stop.
I think lying by omission is a bit, of a stretch, how about "hey you may want to submit as a group." Thanks for your "constructive" feedback, have a great day!
You can request working group adoption, at which point the WG will review your document and form a consensus.
> I think lying by omission is a bit, of a stretch,
No it's not, since you're marketing this as "IETF draft" on HN.