Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
1–10 of 317 posts
Re: Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
#2These are very good numbers. I still don’t get why they don’t compare against latest competitor versions in these posts, it’s not like we’re all not going to notice.
Re: Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
#3[flagged]
Re: Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
#4It is super strange that all last (3?) releases they keep comparing older models such as Opus-4.6.
Re: Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
#5These are very good numbers. I still don’t get why they don’t compare against latest competitor versions in these posts, it’s not like we’re all not going to notice.
this puzzles me too, I want to know
Re: Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
#6It is super strange that all last (3?) releases they keep comparing older models such as Opus-4.6.
Some of it’s probably timing. Some of it is wanting to look good. That said, I just went to the claw-eval site, and neither 4.7 nor 5.5 from oAI are listed on the benchmarks. So there’s also just the time from others to get benchmarking done and published.
Re: Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
#7Looking forward to more open weight releases from Qwen, especially 122B and 397B.
Re: Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
#8Looking forward to more open weight releases from Qwen, especially 122B and 397B.
Yeah that 60-150b~ range is such a sweet spot for current 'prosumer' hardware, I'd love to see something like a 120b-a14b or there about.
Re: Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
#9Any reports from people using their coding agent(s)?
Re: Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier
#10These are very good numbers. I still don’t get why they don’t compare against latest competitor versions in these posts, it’s not like we’re all not going to notice.
I think its part of the expectation setting (with a side of we did our distillation/ eval harness on a specific model).
if they say it's 4.7 comparable, it anchors that into your head as the model to evaluate against.