Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
experimental-history.com
Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
#2Re: Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
#3What that means in practice is that truth is the opinion of powerful.
And so we find it.
Re: Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
#4Re: Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
#5Re: Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
#6Separation of power.
https://www.c-span.org/clip/senate-committee/user-clip-scali...
In the above clip, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia mentioned the exact same example that the article mentions. That the Soviet Union’s constitution guaranteed many rights that the Soviet Union never actually gave to the people. He says this is because the Soviet Union had no mechanism to prevent the centralization of power. And when power was centralized into one man (Stalin) or one committee (the Politburo) then the true constitution was really whatever that man said or what that committee said.
So a good mechanism to guarantee freedom, liberty, human rights…is to ensure power remains decentralized and separated into various different groups
Re: Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
#7The greatest trick the devil ever played was convincing us that there is no objective morality. He did this by playing to our appetites: lust, greed, gluttony and above all pride. No one can tell me what to do, that’s just your opinion man. What that means in practice is that truth is the opinion of powerful. And so we find it.
Consequently in the practical judgment of conscience, which imposes on the person the obligation to perform a given act, the link between freedom and truth is made manifest. Precisely for this reason conscience expresses itself in acts of "judgment" which reflect the truth about the good, and not in arbitrary "decisions". The maturity and responsibility of these judgments — and, when all is said and done, of the individual who is their subject — are not measured by the liberation of the conscience from objective truth, in favour of an alleged autonomy in personal decisions, but, on the contrary, by an insistent search for truth and by allowing oneself to be guided by that truth in one's actions.
— Veritatis splendor, 61, John Paul II, 6 Aug 1993, https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/d...
Re: Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
#8Re: Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
#9Violence is the most effective behavior modification because it leverages pain. Every moral good has to be anchored to pain and its avoidance. Tit for tat is rational violence allocation. The golden rule has some "contrapositive" version right? I'll harm you in the way I should be harmed for bad actions.
Domestically, even with the threat of state violence (imprisonment), most offenders are repeat offenders, so how effective is violence really?
Re: Shame them, shun them, ban them, beat them
#10A thought-provoking piece, albeit a depressing one, because we've been cooking for decades in the fetid juices of compassion-destroying propaganda (largely to support unfettered capitalism), and the diagnosis here suggests that trying to "uncook" society is impossible; some kind of lightning bolt would be the only salvation and I cannot imagine what that would look like.
The project was... For the most part unsuccessful.
I don't think there is a cure. A society will be largely stuck in the rut that it's in.