My Thoughts on Bun's Rust Rewrite

#1

Post by jwzxgo » Sat, May 16, 2026, 11:40 PM UTC

My Thoughts on Bun's Rust Rewrite
en.liujiacai.net

Re: My Thoughts on Bun's Rust Rewrite

#2

Post by [deleted] » Sat, May 16, 2026, 11:40 PM UTC

[deleted]

Re: My Thoughts on Bun's Rust Rewrite

#3

Post by evolve2k » Sun, May 17, 2026, 4:46 PM UTC

I found this an interesting read until the second to last sentence:

“ Zig built the foundation, Claude erected the building, human reviewers are still en route.”

Wait?! Was this article also written with AI? Surely the author wouldn’t be so err pompus and dare I say somewhat hypocritical.

Re: My Thoughts on Bun's Rust Rewrite

#4

Post by starkeeper » Sun, May 17, 2026, 6:03 PM UTC

needs prescription for zig drama copium

Re: My Thoughts on Bun's Rust Rewrite

#5

Post by Cpoll » Sun, May 17, 2026, 8:14 PM UTC

evolve2k wrote: post #3

I found this an interesting read until the second to last sentence: “ Zig built the foundation, Claude erected the building, human reviewers are still en route.” Wait?! Was this article also written with AI? Surely the author wouldn’t be so err pompus and dare I say somewhat hypocritical.

The repetitiveness should be a tipoff, if the other tells aren't. The only insight is that no human read/approved the rewrite PR.

Re: My Thoughts on Bun's Rust Rewrite

#6

Post by starkeeper » Sun, May 17, 2026, 9:10 PM UTC

Cpoll wrote: post #5

evolve2k wrote: post #3

I found this an interesting read until the second to last sentence: “ Zig built the foundation, Claude erected the building, human reviewers are still en route.” Wait?! Was this article also written with AI? Surely the author wouldn’t be so err pompus and dare I say somewhat hypocritical.

The repetitiveness should be a tipoff, if the other tells aren't. The only insight is that no human read/approved the rewrite PR.

And even this fact is irrelevant since this is a developer branch experiment and people are only guessing and making assumptions. It's more my language is beader bravado bullshit.

Re: My Thoughts on Bun's Rust Rewrite

#7

Post by nananana9 » Tue, May 19, 2026, 1:25 PM UTC

starkeeper wrote: post #6

Cpoll wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The repetitiveness should be a tipoff, if the other tells aren't. The only insight is that no human read/approved the rewrite PR.

And even this fact is irrelevant since this is a developer branch experiment and people are only guessing and making assumptions. It's more my language is beader bravado bullshit.

It literally got merged 4 days ago.

Re: My Thoughts on Bun's Rust Rewrite

#8

Post by starkeeper » Tue, May 19, 2026, 7:48 PM UTC

nananana9 wrote: post #7

starkeeper wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And even this fact is irrelevant since this is a developer branch experiment and people are only guessing and making assumptions. It's more my language is beader bravado bullshit.

It literally got merged 4 days ago.

Oh thanks woops I have not been following closely enough. Still it's an AI written whine! :)