Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What is shared across participants within "AI-native" environments?

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–5 of 5 posts

Ask HN: What is shared across participants within "AI-native" environments?

#1

Post by juun_roh »

I see a lot of discussions happening around AI workflows nowadays; not only on social medias, but also in my working environment.

Less about architectures or principles, more and more about prompting, agents, MCPs.

Less about what and how "the work" should be done, becoming more what and how "the instructions" should be written for AI.

Am I the only one experiencing it?

Re: Ask HN: What is shared across participants within "AI-native" environments?

#2

Post by esafak »

One practice I've heard is reviewing formal work specs like https://specs.md/ or https://github.github.com/spec-kit/ INSTEAD of code. I see value in using a standardized spec throughout a company, like a PR template, but skipping code review is a bridge I'm not ready to cross yet.

Re: Ask HN: What is shared across participants within "AI-native" environments?

#3

Post by juun_roh »

esafak wrote: post #2

One practice I've heard is reviewing formal work specs like https://specs.md/ or https://github.github.com/spec-kit/ INSTEAD of code. I see value in using a standardized spec throughout a company, like a PR template, but skipping code review is a bridge I'm not ready to cross yet.

Me neither. I feel like the opportunities of learning "how to define problems and establish standards" are getting replaced with "how to write better instructions".
Post reply on HN