Live data from Hacker News

Regex Chess: A 2-ply minimax chess engine in 84,688 regular expressions

nicholas.carlini.com

1–10 of 56 posts

Re: Regex Chess: A 2-ply minimax chess engine in 84,688 regular expressions

#4
The technical write up is worth perusing but I played a game before reading and accidentally found a winning strategy immediately. I'm not sure if this is a result of the 2-ply nature of the engine or if the mentioned deficiencies account for this but the computer did not act to prevent checkmate in 1 (without any intervening check); the game I played was (in algebraic notation): 1. e4 e5 2. kf3 kf6 3. kxe5 kxe4 4. d4 kxf2 5. Kxf2 a5 6. Qf3 b5?? 7. Qxf7 1-0

Re: Regex Chess: A 2-ply minimax chess engine in 84,688 regular expressions

#5
This is amazing. I'm at loss for words.

During my CS years I remember being fascinated by NFA's, as opposed to boring single universe DFA's.

For some reason I internalized that I would never see something like an NFA implemented beyond text books.

Then came Carlini.

Re: Regex Chess: A 2-ply minimax chess engine in 84,688 regular expressions

#6
post #5

This is amazing. I'm at loss for words. During my CS years I remember being fascinated by NFA's, as opposed to boring single universe DFA's. For some reason I internalized that I would never see something like an NFA implemented beyond text books. Then came Carlini.

But... they are equivalent?

Re: Regex Chess: A 2-ply minimax chess engine in 84,688 regular expressions

#10
post #9

This is absurd. I did not realize you could do nearly this much computation in regex.

It’s turing complete so you could compile almost any language to regex. You might have to build a vm for some languages, also in regex. The point is, it’s regex all the way down.
Post reply on HN