Ask HN: Which LLM are you using to evaluate your ideas?
1–10 of 16 posts
Re: Ask HN: Which LLM are you using to evaluate your ideas?
#2Re: Ask HN: Which LLM are you using to evaluate your ideas?
#3I am mostly using Gemini, but that's a decision I made 2-3 months ago. I try my best not to hint at what answer I am hoping for/would benefit me, and I play devil's advocate as much as possible.
I'm not coding with it much.
Re: Ask HN: Which LLM are you using to evaluate your ideas?
#4Re: Ask HN: Which LLM are you using to evaluate your ideas?
#5I use ChatGPT and Gemini and Claude in various ways in my workflow
Re: Ask HN: Which LLM are you using to evaluate your ideas?
#6Re: Ask HN: Which LLM are you using to evaluate your ideas?
#7Re: Ask HN: Which LLM are you using to evaluate your ideas?
#8GPT mostly for product direction and positioning discussions. Codex for implementation-heavy changes and large refactors. v0 more for landing page structure / UI iteration.
I still find product judgment and SEO decisions require a lot of manual thinking though.
Re: Ask HN: Which LLM are you using to evaluate your ideas?
#9Then I used Gemini and it was great as well, but very limited when it comes to coding (in Antigravity) because instead of giving me credits for coding in the subscription they give you GB on Google Drive. So you burn through the coding very quickly.
Github Copilot is the worst. It usually gets lost while editing some file. And it is incredibly slow.
Then I swithced to Codex and ChatGPT. Great combo for everything. Good at coding, good at exploring, generous with limits (much more so the first month).
I haven't used Claude Code directly, but Claude Opus 4.x was probably the best model for coding used via Copilot and Antigravity.