The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
1–10 of 77 posts
Re: The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
#2Obviously just performative signalling that doesn't really do much. You can't definitively tell if AI was used, so the rule can never realistically be enforced.
Then again, the Oscars are surely almost entirely vibes based anyway. So it's hardly some internally consistent system of merit in the first place.
Re: The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
#3Obviously just performative signalling that doesn't really do much. You can't definitively tell if AI was used, so the rule can never realistically be enforced. Then again, the Oscars are surely almost entirely vibes based anyway. So it's hardly some internally consistent system of merit in the first place.
The younger generation also increasingly pays less attention to traditional mainstream entertainment and media, as now they can create more of it with AI.
Edit: funny to see the anti-AI crowd showing up again, how predictable... you can downvote but you can't stop the truth! Legacy entertainment is dying, and will soon become irrelevant.
Re: The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
#4I would be surprised if it weren't already de facto banned, like how motion capture performances are essentially banned from Best Actor/Actress awards
Re: The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
#5Obvious decision for any institution with at least a modicum of artistic self-respect.
Re: The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
#6Obviously just performative signalling that doesn't really do much. You can't definitively tell if AI was used, so the rule can never realistically be enforced. Then again, the Oscars are surely almost entirely vibes based anyway. So it's hardly some internally consistent system of merit in the first place.
You can't definitively tell if athletes are doping, or students are cheating, it should then be allowed.
Re: The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
#7I would be surprised if it weren't already de facto banned, like how motion capture performances are essentially banned from Best Actor/Actress awards
Why should motion capture be banned from those awards?
Re: The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
#8[flagged]
Re: The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
#9I would be surprised if it weren't already de facto banned, like how motion capture performances are essentially banned from Best Actor/Actress awards
Why should motion capture be banned from those awards?
I don't know, but Andy Serkis was robbed of a Best Supporting Actor nomination because Gollum was regarded as "just a CG Character".
Re: The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards
#10Obviously just performative signalling that doesn't really do much. You can't definitively tell if AI was used, so the rule can never realistically be enforced. Then again, the Oscars are surely almost entirely vibes based anyway. So it's hardly some internally consistent system of merit in the first place.
It prevents anyone from blatantly using AI. If they want to use it anyway and risk getting found out, sure. That's still a big difference.