Live data from Hacker News

Do_not_track

donottrack.sh

1–10 of 179 posts

Re: Do_not_track

#5
> Many CLI tools, SDKs, and frameworks collect telemetry data by default.

Any of those are using a dark pattern and before exploring new ways to opt out you should look for and spend your energy on an alternative which respects your freedoms upfront.

Re: Do_not_track

#6
I was surprised how hard it was to stop the Python transformers library from phoning home to Hugging Face. I set HF_HUB_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=1, and when I called Wav2Vec2CTCTokenizer.from_pretrained I explicitly passed local_files_only=True, but still I got got a warning about not having a valid HF_TOKEN. It wasn't until I stumbled upon HF_HUB_OFFLINE=1 that I'm somewhat confident that I'm not making outgoing connections to HF every time I load a wav2vec2 model from disk.

I wouldn't have realized this was happening at all if it weren't for the obnoxious HF_TOKEN warning.

Re: Do_not_track

#8

The most useful part of this page is the list of optout commands to stick in my shellrc. Is anyone maintaining a more complete list of those?

an LLM would do a fine job for most common things, doesn't really matter if a few of them get hallucinated

Re: Do_not_track

#9
post #5

> Many CLI tools, SDKs, and frameworks collect telemetry data by default. Any of those are using a dark pattern and before exploring new ways to opt out you should look for and spend your energy on an alternative which respects your freedoms upfront.

Exactly, new “standard” won’t fix it

Re: Do_not_track

#10
Looks like a helpful honeypot! Any tool that will public announce support for this spec is a tool I know to avoid because it collects telemetry without explicit opt-in in the first place.
Post reply on HN