K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
github.com
K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
1–10 of 55 posts
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#2[flagged]
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#3So this is basically vCluster[0] but Rancher branded?
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#4Missed the opportunity to call it Kink ...
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#5So this is basically vCluster[0] but Rancher branded? [0] https://github.com/loft-sh/vcluster
Closely related in pupopse, yes. Branded? no.
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#6Missed the opportunity to call it Kink ...
That's what I'll be calling it
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#7Nice, now we need K3Kind
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#8Do Rancher side products generally make it into a stable state such that you would want to run mission-critical systems on?
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#9What does k3k stand for? Can we just put whatever number we want between 2 letters now?
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#10This is, if I had to guess, a monument to a small team's stubborn insistence that such a thing could be done at all. If I can hope for a reward for them, may it be that they are allowed to hand off maintaining it to another team.