Live data from Hacker News

Honker – Durable queues, streams, pub/sub, and cron scheduler in a SQLite file

honker.dev

1–10 of 69 posts

Re: Honker – Durable queues, streams, pub/sub, and cron scheduler in a SQLite file

#3
It’s an interesting approach and can be quite fun to use for new projects.

> How it works: honker polls SQLite’s PRAGMA data_version every millisecond. That’s a monotonic counter SQLite increments on every commit from any connection, journal mode, or process — a ~3 µs read for a precise wake signal.

Re: Honker – Durable queues, streams, pub/sub, and cron scheduler in a SQLite file

#5
"Idle cost is that one lightweight SELECT per millisecond per database — no page-cache pressure, no writer-lock contention, no kernel file watcher in the mix."

I think (respectfully) the LLM that probably wrote this overshot the mark here because busy-polling a select does not actually sound better to me than a "kernel file watcher".

Re: Honker – Durable queues, streams, pub/sub, and cron scheduler in a SQLite file

#8
post #5

"Idle cost is that one lightweight SELECT per millisecond per database — no page-cache pressure, no writer-lock contention, no kernel file watcher in the mix." I think (respectfully) the LLM that probably wrote this overshot the mark here because busy-polling a select does not actually sound better to me than a "kernel file watcher".

"one lightweight SELECT per millisecond"

This reminds me of the teenager who told her dad that she was just a tiny little bit pregnant.

Re: Honker – Durable queues, streams, pub/sub, and cron scheduler in a SQLite file

#9
post #5

"Idle cost is that one lightweight SELECT per millisecond per database — no page-cache pressure, no writer-lock contention, no kernel file watcher in the mix." I think (respectfully) the LLM that probably wrote this overshot the mark here because busy-polling a select does not actually sound better to me than a "kernel file watcher".

[flagged]

Re: Honker – Durable queues, streams, pub/sub, and cron scheduler in a SQLite file

#10
post #5

"Idle cost is that one lightweight SELECT per millisecond per database — no page-cache pressure, no writer-lock contention, no kernel file watcher in the mix." I think (respectfully) the LLM that probably wrote this overshot the mark here because busy-polling a select does not actually sound better to me than a "kernel file watcher".

Yeah, I had the same instinct - this feels very much like a "nice idea" but the execution falls short. I mean - busily banging on sqlite like this? Shit at that point just use Redis.
Post reply on HN