At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
1–10 of 88 posts
Re: At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
#2Typical example: “In the years since, several others connected to JPL have also died or disappeared: Frank Maiwald, a specialist in space research, died in Los Angeles in 2024 at 61.”
Re: At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
#3Re: At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
#4Last time I looked into this (last week, I think) it was a big wad of nothing. The people had disappeared over a span of many years. They weren't tied to any particular program, employer, or even any particular area of study, just “uh, tech stuff”. Some of them were technical experts, some weren't; one was an administrative assistant. One was killed by a campus shooter who also killed two students. Typical example: “…
Or stupider: At least 10 people flipped a coin and it ended up on Heads!
The fact that it reached CNN levels of stupid means journalism is part of the overall USA's intentional brain drain.
Re: At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
#5Re: At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
#6Last time I looked into this (last week, I think) it was a big wad of nothing. The people had disappeared over a span of many years. They weren't tied to any particular program, employer, or even any particular area of study, just “uh, tech stuff”. Some of them were technical experts, some weren't; one was an administrative assistant. One was killed by a campus shooter who also killed two students. Typical example: “…
Yeah, it's like "At least 10 people with a red sweater on Tuesday have gone missing". Or stupider: At least 10 people flipped a coin and it ended up on Heads! The fact that it reached CNN levels of stupid means journalism is part of the overall USA's intentional brain drain.
“Anthony Chavez, 79, worked at Los Alamos National Laboratory until he retired in 2017. He reportedly disappeared on May 8, 2025.”
Re: At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
#7Last time I looked into this (last week, I think) it was a big wad of nothing. The people had disappeared over a span of many years. They weren't tied to any particular program, employer, or even any particular area of study, just “uh, tech stuff”. Some of them were technical experts, some weren't; one was an administrative assistant. One was killed by a campus shooter who also killed two students. Typical example: “…
Yeah, it's like "At least 10 people with a red sweater on Tuesday have gone missing". Or stupider: At least 10 people flipped a coin and it ended up on Heads! The fact that it reached CNN levels of stupid means journalism is part of the overall USA's intentional brain drain.
Re: At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
#8Re: At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
#9Color me skeptical. Whenever I see this come up in a social media feed it's a UFO influencer. It's leaked out into the legacy news presenters who have great haircuts and no critical thinking skills.
Re: At least 10 people tied to sensitive US research have died or disappeared
#10Last time I looked into this (last week, I think) it was a big wad of nothing. The people had disappeared over a span of many years. They weren't tied to any particular program, employer, or even any particular area of study, just “uh, tech stuff”. Some of them were technical experts, some weren't; one was an administrative assistant. One was killed by a campus shooter who also killed two students. Typical example: “…
Yeah, it's like "At least 10 people with a red sweater on Tuesday have gone missing". Or stupider: At least 10 people flipped a coin and it ended up on Heads! The fact that it reached CNN levels of stupid means journalism is part of the overall USA's intentional brain drain.