Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
discuss.grapheneos.org
Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
1–10 of 343 posts
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#2Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#3Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#4They Built a Legendary Privacy Tool. Now They're Sworn Enemies https://www.wired.com/story/they-built-privacy-tool-graphene... (https://archive.ph/pbJu9)
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#5[flagged]
You are very much saying that OP is an attack post.
Or at least implying the point that it is tonally dissonant to claim otherwise.
If you didn't believe it was wrong you would comment on the post but you are explicitly avoiding doing that.
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#6Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#7[flagged]
Sometimes they aren't even factually correct and get a bit upset about it when called out.
Anyways, I have gotten the same impression and these seem like red flags to me as well.
Which is why I'd take everything in that response with a mountain of salt (and I'd pay attention to what they're not saying).
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#8Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#9Wired article: They Built a Legendary Privacy Tool. Now They're Sworn Enemies https://www.wired.com/story/they-built-privacy-tool-graphene... ( https://archive.ph/pbJu9 )
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#10[flagged]
I ask because I'd be pretty disappointed in GrapheneOS over that kind of thing and it'd probably at least partially change my opinion of them, but it's better to validate these types of serious accusations and get the full context.