The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
boss.blogs.nytimes.com
The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
#2Re: The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
#3I thought this might be a story about a worker-owned cooperative ... but it looks like it's just a few founders who brought their own money into the business (not uncommon) and who are now looking for outside capital (also not uncommon).
Re: The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
#4Re: The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
#5To the "beer geeks", there's seemingly an ongoing debate whether a contract brewery is a "real" brewery. But that's another discussion...
Re: The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
#6the brewery and it's brewer are making the beer. This is just a case of a salesman without a factory.
The car analogy is trying to buy a new battery. there's 3 factories, and 999 brands. The work to know which battery will not fail you sooner is to find out which factory puts out the brand you can get cheap on your area. With the beer it's the same. the recipe can be great, but which brewery is making which batch, with water from where?
Re: The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
#7Re: The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
#8Re: The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
#9Re: The Genius of Starting a Company Without Outside Capital
#10At some point, they'll likely have to scale out scope and then need to hire people, but would anyone really want to work for a jackpot start-up that doesn't offer any equity, even if the salary is competitive?
I don't think I'd want to work for people who kept all the equity for themselves and are necessarily making off like bandits with business value I generate. I feel this is a recipe for extremely high turnover in the software world.
But hey, that's me. What do I know?