Live data from Hacker News

Two Months After I Gave an AI $100 and No Instructions

sebastian-jais.de

1–10 of 122 posts

Re: Two Months After I Gave an AI $100 and No Instructions

#7

Are you able to give us the prompt you used to write the article?

I can no longer tell the difference between an article written by an AI and an article written by a human who has spent too long reading AI output.

It's not just that AI is becoming a little better; the humans are getting worse, too. They're meeting in the mediocre middle.

Re: Two Months After I Gave an AI $100 and No Instructions

#8
post #5

I wonder if anyone has run one of the free models continuously for a long time to see what it outputs? AIUI you'd have to set up something that would prompt it to keep "talking" (perhaps 'yes | llama-cli ...`)

I think the concept you're talking about has been described as LLM attractor states. Here's a LW post about it for Deepseek v3 https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/rvbjZMp6aEDn2jiyp/mapping-ll...

Re: Two Months After I Gave an AI $100 and No Instructions

#9
post #6

Interesting but by telling it to check X for mentions of itself, that is an action.. wouldn't this essentially direct it and hence be steered/controlled by random individuals on the internet?

Yeah, I genuinely can't figure out what an AI would do with "no instructions."
Post reply on HN