The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet
1–10 of 84 posts
Re: The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet
#2Re: The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet
#3Re: The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet
#4It appears IBM learned no lessons after WWII: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
That book will need a sequel soon.
Re: The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet
#5Better to have smart bombs than dumb ones. Or rather, better to have 1 smart bomb than 1000 dumb ones spread across an entire city in order to pick off the particular building, vehicle, or person you want.
[1] https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2029575052535173364
[2] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/6/elementary-school-in...
Re: The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet
#6Better to have smart bombs than dumb ones. Or rather, better to have 1 smart bomb than 1000 dumb ones spread across an entire city in order to pick off the particular building, vehicle, or person you want.
Re: The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet
#7Archive URL to original paper
Re: The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet
#8> With that in mind, it seems Red Hat, owned by IBM, is desperately trying to scrub a certain white paper from the internet. Titled “Compress the kill cycle with Red Hat Device Edge”, the 2024 white paper details how Red Hat’s products and technologies can make it easier and faster to, well, kill people. It appears IBM learned no lessons after WWII: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust That book will n…
Re: The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet
#9Better to have smart bombs than dumb ones. Or rather, better to have 1 smart bomb than 1000 dumb ones spread across an entire city in order to pick off the particular building, vehicle, or person you want.
You want consensus from non-experts for a plan to use 20 smart bombs.
Your opponent wants consensus for a plan to live-stream a demo of 1 smart bomb, and then use 19 dumb ones.
Your team has more expertise.
Your opponent's plan saves enough money to buy a better PR team than yours, and is still more cost effective than your plan.
Who wins?