Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
github.com
Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
1–10 of 88 posts
Re: Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
#2Honestly this is just a case of open source software users expecting a free lunch. Firstly, the maintainers of this package don’t owe you anything, secondly the new version of neovim and treesitter-cli are already in Arch extra testing, and since they don’t break anything they’ll probably be in extra next week, so chill the fuck out.
If you have a problem with how open source works just please head back to vscode.
Re: Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
#3Incredibly based response to the "I am the customer" energy in OSS.
Re: Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
#4This is why I built nvim from source, and git pull plugins into the pack directory. I think it's even a static binary. Whatever changes I need I git pull. After they added LSP I have not wished for anything else really, so I stopped pulling. I think I pulled LSP completion API in 0.11 era but that's it.
Hate it when people break backwards compatibility. For me it's sacrosanct, more important than absolutely anything else.
I only have a handful of plugins so the system works well. And I have a 500 line init.vim (and no other config).
Some ecosystems like golang share this principle and so I can freely update packages without worrying about breakages. But other ecosystems(nvim, python, etc) I'm a lone warrior
Re: Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
#5idgi, shitting on the maintainer takes 10x more time than forking the repo
I guess he really needed the latest ci/chore commits
Re: Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
#6This was probably near the breaking point before, it just needed an idiot to catalyze.
Re: Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
#7I will never understand people like GitHub user “shushtain” in the linked issue.
So obviously the guy is behaving like an entitled jerk, but it’s also surely counter-productive (volunteer maintainers are unlikely to respond well to plain rudeness)? Unless the goal isn’t a productive outcome, but just to be mean?
Re: Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
#8I will never understand people like GitHub user “shushtain” in the linked issue. So obviously the guy is behaving like an entitled jerk, but it’s also surely counter-productive (volunteer maintainers are unlikely to respond well to plain rudeness)? Unless the goal isn’t a productive outcome, but just to be mean?
[dead]
Re: Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
#9Good for the maintainer, hope they find peace and do things just for their fun, without needing to deal with comments like that anymore
Re: Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived
#10I will never understand people like GitHub user “shushtain” in the linked issue. So obviously the guy is behaving like an entitled jerk, but it’s also surely counter-productive (volunteer maintainers are unlikely to respond well to plain rudeness)? Unless the goal isn’t a productive outcome, but just to be mean?
Humans are notoriously bad at game theory.