Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
#2Re: Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
#3So... The Torpedo Bat is basically the Placebo Bat?
And it compares equal weight bats. If the torpedo bat allows you to use a lighter bat, that will increase your swing speed.
Re: Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
#4Re: Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
#5Re: Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
#6Yeah, it's like just ignoring the actual conclusions. I mean, it's easier to hit and then it hits less hard, which is actually good because professional baseball players generally hit it out of the park when they get a good hit. So the conclusion is actually completely opposite what the title of the article is - it's not the same. It is a substantial improvement.
Re: Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
#7Re: Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
#8So... The Torpedo Bat is basically the Placebo Bat?
The end of the article notes several very real changes in behavior, including being more likely to get a hit, which is significant. And it compares equal weight bats. If the torpedo bat allows you to use a lighter bat, that will increase your swing speed.
Re: Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
#9Disappointing article. As another commenter mentioned, the very last sentence of the article reveals a potentially positive impact on batting average, which is extremely relevant to how well a bat works! But this seems to be ignored by the conclusion of both the researchers and the article, which focuses on hitting power.
Re: Study investigates how mass distribution of baseball bat affects performance
#10Yeah, it's like just ignoring the actual conclusions. I mean, it's easier to hit and then it hits less hard, which is actually good because professional baseball players generally hit it out of the park when they get a good hit. So the conclusion is actually completely opposite what the title of the article is - it's not the same. It is a substantial improvement.
1. Provide “distinct” proof 2. Title it as the antithesis