Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Wikipedia’s new HTML5 video player

blog.wikimedia.org

1–10 of 22 posts

Re: Introducing Wikipedia’s new HTML5 video player

#3
post #2

The camel video barely plays in Chrome 23, froze my Firefox 16.0.2

(I'm a Firefox developer that happens to work on HTML5 audio and video).

I can reproduce your problem on Firefox 16.0.2 , and this is fixed, at least on our Nightly builds, perhaps before that. But it is certainly embarrassing and should not happen (and was not caught during our extensive testing and beta phases), I'll look into back porting the relevant patches.

Again, sorry about that.

Re: Introducing Wikipedia’s new HTML5 video player

#4
post #3
post #2

The camel video barely plays in Chrome 23, froze my Firefox 16.0.2

(I'm a Firefox developer that happens to work on HTML5 audio and video). I can reproduce your problem on Firefox 16.0.2 , and this is fixed, at least on our Nightly builds, perhaps before that. But it is certainly embarrassing and should not happen (and was not caught during our extensive testing and beta phases), I'll look into back porting the relevant patches. Again, sorry about that.

Nothing to be sorry about, you guys are doing a great job. Bugs happen, bugs get fixed.

Re: Introducing Wikipedia’s new HTML5 video player

#6
post #3
post #2

The camel video barely plays in Chrome 23, froze my Firefox 16.0.2

(I'm a Firefox developer that happens to work on HTML5 audio and video). I can reproduce your problem on Firefox 16.0.2 , and this is fixed, at least on our Nightly builds, perhaps before that. But it is certainly embarrassing and should not happen (and was not caught during our extensive testing and beta phases), I'll look into back porting the relevant patches. Again, sorry about that.

You are great guys. I would have never used internet if I didn't get Firefox.

Re: Introducing Wikipedia’s new HTML5 video player

#10
Looks like Wikipedia is on track to become a big server of HTML5 WebM videos. The absence of H.264 support (assuming they hold on to that) might finally push Microsoft and Apple to support WebM out of the box. Maybe we will also see more hardware support for WebM in mobile devices...
Post reply on HN