Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
1–10 of 128 posts
Re: Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
#2Re: Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
#3That said, given how things are I wouldn't be surprised if you could let Claude or similar have a go at the source code of the kernel or core services, armed with some VMs for the try-fail iteration, and get it pumping out CVEs.
If not now, then surely not in a too distant future.
[1]: https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:08...
Re: Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
#4Re: Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
#5Re: Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
#6Re: Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
#7https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sd26pWhfmg
Looks like LLMs are getting good at finding and exploiting these.
Re: Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
#8Key point is that Claude did not find the bug it exploits. It was given the CVE writeup[1] and was asked to write a program that could exploit the bug. That said, given how things are I wouldn't be surprised if you could let Claude or similar have a go at the source code of the kernel or core services, armed with some VMs for the try-fail iteration, and get it pumping out CVEs. If not now, then surely not in a too di…
Claude was used to find the bug in the first place though. That CVE write-up happened because of Claude, so while there are some very talented humans in the loop, Claude is quite involved with the whole process.
Re: Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
#9Key point is that Claude did not find the bug it exploits. It was given the CVE writeup[1] and was asked to write a program that could exploit the bug. That said, given how things are I wouldn't be surprised if you could let Claude or similar have a go at the source code of the kernel or core services, armed with some VMs for the try-fail iteration, and get it pumping out CVEs. If not now, then surely not in a too di…
FreeBSD kernel is written in C right?
AI bots will trivially find CVEs.
Re: Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell
#10Key point is that Claude did not find the bug it exploits. It was given the CVE writeup[1] and was asked to write a program that could exploit the bug. That said, given how things are I wouldn't be surprised if you could let Claude or similar have a go at the source code of the kernel or core services, armed with some VMs for the try-fail iteration, and get it pumping out CVEs. If not now, then surely not in a too di…
> Credits: Nicholas Carlini using Claude, Anthropic Claude was used to find the bug in the first place though. That CVE write-up happened because of Claude, so while there are some very talented humans in the loop, Claude is quite involved with the whole process.
Do you have a link to that? A rather important piece of context.
Wasn't trying to downplay this submission the way, the main point still stands:
But finding a bug and exploiting it are very different things. Exploit development requires understanding OS internals, crafting ROP chains, managing memory layouts, debugging crashes, and adapting when things go wrong. This has long been considered the frontier that only humans can cross.
Each new AI capability is usually met with “AI can do Y, but only humans can do X.” Well, for X = exploit development, that line just moved.