FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
theatlantic.com
FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
#2What really interests me is that amazing ad unit -- it's a "sponsored article from Bank of America". I actually read it, unlike a banner ad, and while if I were at all in the market for a family social network, I'd now be interested in FamilyLeaf, it ALSO made me somewhat more positive toward Bank of America.
This seems a whole lot more effective than running banner ads.
Re: FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
#3I think ultimately, the emphasis on the private nature of all of these social networks has one single limitation issue: the building of network requires few people taking initiative of building the network (which you have identified as "family administrator"). Without such people taking initiative, these networks don't really go anywhere. And we know that not everyone takes those initiatives, especially when the site is brand new, unknown and/or not so popular.
Just some thoughts.
Re: FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
#4Many many many of these types of sites have launched and died. Dont let that deter you ! This Githubs first idea. One of these will work !
Re: FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
#5Re: FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
#6I'm also not really in the target demographic, but if someone asked me why they should choose to use this service instead of Facebook, I'd be hard pressed to give them a reason.
Re: FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
#7Photos and everything is still stored on a remote uncontrolled server.
Re: FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
#8I don't understand: how is this more secure? Maybe I don't understand the meaning of the word 'secure' in this context. Photos and everything is still stored on a remote uncontrolled server.
This and things like Pair, the social network for couples, I would suspect are shooting for high 'value' - where value is correlated with selling that information to third parties (advertisers, at best; but other parties are possible customers too).
edit - after reading their privacy policy, they do currently seem to have a good standing; even so I'd generally be cautious
Re: FamilyLeaf (YC W12) - Your Family's Private Social Network
#9I don't understand: how is this more secure? Maybe I don't understand the meaning of the word 'secure' in this context. Photos and everything is still stored on a remote uncontrolled server.
Indeed, I'd see it the same way - for individuals (and indeed families) it certainly is not really more secure - if anything, less so due to the likelihood and encouragement for families to put more intimate/sensitive and personal details into the environment. This and things like Pair, the social network for couples, I would suspect are shooting for high 'value' - where value is correlated with selling that informat…