Untitled topic
1–2 of 2 posts
Re: undefined
#2Tried running some multi-step agent workflows recently, and honestly — things broke more than I expected.
Not because the model was “bad”, but because:
small errors compound across steps outputs drift slightly each time one wrong assumption early= everything downstream breaks What surprised me is this: model intelligence didn’t matter as much as consistency
Even when using mm2.7, which works fine in isolation, reliability across chained steps becomes the real bottleneck So now I’m wondering:
What models are people actually using for agent workflows? Are you optimizing for intelligence, speed, or consistency? How do you deal with failures across steps? So now I’m wondering:
What models are people actually using for agent workflows? Are you optimizing for intelligence, speed, or consistency? How do you deal with failures across steps?