"I hope you don't use Generative AI"
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: "I hope you don't use Generative AI"
#2[dead]
Re: "I hope you don't use Generative AI"
#3I tried to read this and I have no idea what it's about after +10 paragraphs. Needs a good edit.
Re: "I hope you don't use Generative AI"
#4I tried to read this and I have no idea what it's about after +10 paragraphs. Needs a good edit.
Yeah, they do very much need an editor (I suppose it was tagged as a #rant!)
The thing I found interesting (and I've not really observed much) is they're complaining about people who aren't making a distinction between the use of generative AI to assist with boilerplate utilitarian code, vs image diffusion models to replace artists.
Re: "I hope you don't use Generative AI"
#5I tried to read this and I have no idea what it's about after +10 paragraphs. Needs a good edit.
Yeah, they do very much need an editor (I suppose it was tagged as a #rant!) The thing I found interesting (and I've not really observed much) is they're complaining about people who aren't making a distinction between the use of generative AI to assist with boilerplate utilitarian code, vs image diffusion models to replace artists.
Ah thanks. I’m sympathetic to this, but I don’t expect most people to be able to draw that line.