Live data from Hacker News

Levels of programmers (2009)

codinghorror.com

1–10 of 41 posts

Re: Levels of programmers (2009)

#4
not everyone wants to be a "Rockstar Programmer!!!11!!"

I want to know what I'm doing and why I'm doing it and why it works or doesn't work.

I don't want to be a rockstar, I want to be confident in my current abilities and in my ability to always learn more.

Re: Levels of programmers (2009)

#5
post #2

I am currently an average programmer, as judged by this scale.

It seems to me that average programmer and working programmer overlap quite a bit. I might never be a great programmer but there are still plenty of jobs out there I can do well as an average programmer and I always have work.

Re: Levels of programmers (2009)

#6
I'm quite glad he says "tongue firmly planted in cheek", because the idea that a successful programmers are "Programmers who are both well known and have created entire businesses – perhaps even whole industries – around their code." is just plain silly.

I think what he means by success is "money", which might well work for him, but doesn't for many others.

Re: Levels of programmers (2009)

#9
post #3

This doesn't make any sense unless (even if?) you read the version that he's spoofing. http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7art.htm He's just replaced some of the words; the result makes no sense.

But then Ken Rockwell has made rather a career out of making little sense himself, so a parody almost needs to be entirely self-contradictory in order to register as a parody. (Basic JPEG on a D70 is good enough for anybody, but you really do need a Hasselblad. Er, come again Ken? I have to fix photographers who try to believe everything he writes.)
Post reply on HN