It's time for open source to retire
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: It's time for open source to retire
#2""" Mike Nolan
Chief Executive Officer MalusCorp International Holdings Ltd. """
Re: It's time for open source to retire
#3Re: It's time for open source to retire
#4Author is """ Mike Nolan Chief Executive Officer MalusCorp International Holdings Ltd. """
Re: It's time for open source to retire
#5The state of the world is so depressing and I already believe this is satire but I'm only 99% sure. Can someone else confirm?
Re: It's time for open source to retire
#6The state of the world is so depressing and I already believe this is satire but I'm only 99% sure. Can someone else confirm?
To be clear, engineers should not be required in the least to "maintain mental maps of which packages are safe and which will detonate their employer's IP strategy" simply because in the vast majority of cases they're not co-owners of that business or that strategy. That is overstated and intentionally misleading, I suspect. AGPL obligations depend on how software is combined and distributed or network-served, not on some magical "contamination" event from merely touching a package.
Rhetoric through and through, in my opinion.
Re: It's time for open source to retire
#7Re: It's time for open source to retire
#8Author is """ Mike Nolan Chief Executive Officer MalusCorp International Holdings Ltd. """
Also worth linking to his talk at FOSDEM, on which this is based: https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/SUVS7G-lets_end_open_...