Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models
#2AI (VLM-based) radiology models can sound confident and still be wrong ; hallucinating diagnoses that their own findings don't support. This is a silent, and dangerous failure mode.
Our new paper introduces a verification layer that checks every diagnostic claim an AI makes before it reaches a clinician. When our system says a diagnosis is supported, it's been mathematically proven - not just guessed. Every model we tested improved significantly after verification, with our best result hitting 99% soundness.
We're excited about what comes next in building verifiably correct AI systems.
Re: Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models
#3[deleted]
Re: Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models
#4AI (VLM-based) radiology models can sound confident and still be wrong ; hallucinating diagnoses that their own findings don't support. This is a silent, and dangerous failure mode. Our new paper introduces a verification layer that checks every diagnostic claim an AI makes before it reaches a clinician. When our system says a diagnosis is supported, it's been mathematically proven - not just guessed. Every model we…
nice work!I know about your work, similar to this: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20055 and https://github.com/DebarghaG/proofofthought
Re: Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models
#5[flagged]
Re: Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models
#6AI (VLM-based) radiology models can sound confident and still be wrong ; hallucinating diagnoses that their own findings don't support. This is a silent, and dangerous failure mode. Our new paper introduces a verification layer that checks every diagnostic claim an AI makes before it reaches a clinician. When our system says a diagnosis is supported, it's been mathematically proven - not just guessed. Every model we…
nice work!I know about your work, similar to this: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20055 and https://github.com/DebarghaG/proofofthought
Yes, indeed! This work uses the Proof of Thought library and several techniques from VERGE!