I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
1–10 of 1001 posts
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#2So they are such a risk to national security that no contractor that works with the federal government may use them, but they're going to keep using them for six more months? So I guess our national security is significantly at risk for the next six months?
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#3An earlier post to a news article rather than to a tweet: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47186662
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#4Hard decision by Anthropic, but at least they can sleep well at night knowing their products doesn’t kill human beings around the world.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#5This is only the first year of this fascist government, and I believe the first powerful company that is taking a stance? Meta, Apple, etc. have all bent the knee right?
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#6I admire Anthropic for sticking to their principles, even if it affects the bottom line. That’s the kind of company you want to work for.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#7[flagged]
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#8Probably used Claude to write the tweet.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#9Hard decision by Anthropic, but at least they can sleep well at night knowing their products doesn’t kill human beings around the world.
That’s the crazy thing. This whole dispute was over Anthropic saying no to fully automated kill bots. They only required there be a human in the loop to press the button.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#10So they are such a risk to national security that no contractor that works with the federal government may use them, but they're going to keep using them for six more months? So I guess our national security is significantly at risk for the next six months?
Don't make the mistake of thinking their words have meaning. They see a way to punish the company, they take it. Same thing with declaring a national emergency to impose tariffs. There's no supply chain risk, no national emergency, but that doesn't stop them.