Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 146 posts

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#3

Post by botusaurus »

> But NanoClaw isn't just my personal project anymore. Thousands of people are using it. People are running production workloads on it. Businesses are building on it. There's a real community now.

as OpenClaw and now NanoClaw became "enterprise", now we need a new FemtoClaw to pick up the indie/boutique place

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#4

Post by funkaster »

benatkin wrote: post #2

So they're making it use OCI images? Cool. Hopefully there will be good support for Podman.

apple containers also run on OCI images: https://github.com/apple/container?tab=readme-ov-file#contai...

> The tool consumes and produces OCI-compatible container images...

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#7

Post by Tt6000 »

botusaurus wrote: post #3

> But NanoClaw isn't just my personal project anymore. Thousands of people are using it. People are running production workloads on it. Businesses are building on it. There's a real community now. as OpenClaw and now NanoClaw became "enterprise", now we need a new FemtoClaw to pick up the indie/boutique place

How is this "becoming enterprise"? If anything it now defaults to millions of Linux users being able to access it

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#8

Post by stavros »

For my version of the AI assistant, I used a Docker container and Unix permissions:

https://github.com/skorokithakis/stavrobot

All plugins run in one Docker container, but they're isolated from each other by different *nix users, so they can't read each other's files. That's much more lightweight, and you don't have to run one container per plugin.

Crucially, plugins can't read each other's secrets or modify each other's code. I even have a plugin configuration webpage that doesn't go through an LLM, so the LLM never sees your secrets if you don't want to.

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#10

Post by arcanemachiner »

botusaurus wrote: post #3

> But NanoClaw isn't just my personal project anymore. Thousands of people are using it. People are running production workloads on it. Businesses are building on it. There's a real community now. as OpenClaw and now NanoClaw became "enterprise", now we need a new FemtoClaw to pick up the indie/boutique place

Well, there was Picoclaw, but I think it was renamed to Clawlet.
Post reply on HN