Claude Sonnet 4.6
1–10 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude Sonnet 4.6
#2Look at these pelicans fly! Come on, pelican!
Re: Claude Sonnet 4.6
#3Hoe much power did it take to train the models?
Re: Claude Sonnet 4.6
#4It's interesting that the request refusal rate is so much higher in Hindi than in other languages. Are some languages more ambiguous than others?
Re: Claude Sonnet 4.6
#5My take away is: it's roughly as good as Opus 4.5.
Now the question is: how much faster or cheaper is it?
Re: Claude Sonnet 4.6
#6Re: Claude Sonnet 4.6
#7Waiting for the OpenAI GPT-5.3-mini release in 3..2..1
Re: Claude Sonnet 4.6
#8My take away is: it's roughly as good as Opus 4.5. Now the question is: how much faster or cheaper is it?
> That's a long document.
Probably written by LLMs, for LLMs
Re: Claude Sonnet 4.6
#9[flagged]
Re: Claude Sonnet 4.6
#10It's wild that Sonnet 4.6 is roughly as capable as Opus 4.5 - at least according to Anthropic's benchmarks. It will be interesting to see if that's the case in real, practical, everyday use. The speed at which this stuff is improving is really remarkable; it feels like the breakneck pace of compute performance improvements of the 1990s.