Benchmarking Automatic Typesetting Systems
news.speedata.de
Benchmarking Automatic Typesetting Systems
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Benchmarking Automatic Typesetting Systems
#2Re: Benchmarking Automatic Typesetting Systems
#3I benchmark six different typesetting systems, typst ist by far the fastest. This article describes why the speedata Publisher is still my choice for producing product catalogs.
Re: Benchmarking Automatic Typesetting Systems
#4I benchmark six different typesetting systems, typst ist by far the fastest. This article describes why the speedata Publisher is still my choice for producing product catalogs.
This comment has a tone of external reviewer, while appearantly your profile shows you are affiliated.
Re: Benchmarking Automatic Typesetting Systems
#5Re: Benchmarking Automatic Typesetting Systems
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
This comment has a tone of external reviewer, while appearantly your profile shows you are affiliated.
They probably added text to their link submission. It’s not immediately clear that this text shows up as a comment indistinguishable from anyone else’s.
Re: Benchmarking Automatic Typesetting Systems
#7[dead]
There might be settings to speed up things, so if any of the authors provide me with the settings, I'd be happy to implement those.