X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
1–10 of 1001 posts
Re: X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
#2Finally, someone is taking action against the CSAM machine operating seemingly without penalty.
Re: X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
#3> The prosecutor's office also said it was leaving X and would communicate on LinkedIn and Instagram from now on.
I mean, perhaps it's time to completely drop these US-owned, closed-source, algo-driven controversial platforms, and start treating the communication with the public that funds your existence in different terms. The goal should be to reach as many people, of course, but also to ensure that the method and medium of communication is in the interest of the public at large.
Re: X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
#4Finally, someone is taking action against the CSAM machine operating seemingly without penalty.
[flagged]
Re: X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
#5Re: X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
#6Finally, someone is taking action against the CSAM machine operating seemingly without penalty.
[flagged]
CSAM does not have a universal definition. In Sweden for instance, CSAM is any image of an underage subject (real or realistic digital) designed to evoke a sexual response. If you take a picture of a 14 year old girl (age of consent is 15) and use Grok to give her bikini, or make her topless, then you are most definately producing and possessing CSAM.
No abuse of a real minor is needed.
Re: X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
CSAM does not have a universal definition. In Sweden for instance, CSAM is any image of an underage subject (real or realistic digital) designed to evoke a sexual response. If you take a picture of a 14 year old girl (age of consent is 15) and use Grok to give her bikini, or make her topless, then you are most definately producing and possessing CSAM. No abuse of a real minor is needed.
As good as Australia's little boobie laws.
Re: X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
#8> The prosecutor's office also said it was leaving X and would communicate on LinkedIn and Instagram from now on. I mean, perhaps it's time to completely drop these US-owned, closed-source, algo-driven controversial platforms, and start treating the communication with the public that funds your existence in different terms. The goal should be to reach as many people, of course, but also to ensure that the method and…
This. What a joke. Im still waiting on my tax refund from NYC for plastering "twitter" stickers on every publicly funded vehicle.
Re: X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
#9Interesting. This is basically the second enforcement on speech / images that France has done - first was Pavel Durov @ Telegram. He eventually made changes in Telegram's moderation infrastructure and I think was allowed to leave France sometime last year.
I don't love heavy-handed enforcement on speech issues, but I do really like a heterogenous cultural situation, so I think it's interesting and probably to the overall good to have a country pushing on these matters very hard, just as a matter of keeping a diverse set of global standards, something that adds cultural resilience for humanity.
linkedin is not a replacement for twitter, though. I'm curious if they'll come back post-settlement.
Re: X offices raided in France as UK opens fresh investigation into Grok
#10Interesting. This is basically the second enforcement on speech / images that France has done - first was Pavel Durov @ Telegram. He eventually made changes in Telegram's moderation infrastructure and I think was allowed to leave France sometime last year. I don't love heavy-handed enforcement on speech issues, but I do really like a heterogenous cultural situation, so I think it's interesting and probably to the ove…
I wouldn't equate the two.
There's someone who was being held responsible for what was in encrypted chats.
Then there's someone who published depictions of sexual abuse and minors.
Worlds apart.