1–10 of 12 posts
Show HN: OpenJuris – AI legal research with citations from primary sources
openjuris.org
I would also add as feedback that it’s kind of scammy to use the word “open” and “.org” like this when you’re running a for-profit business. It’s not illegal but it feels unethical. Just because OpenAI made fake non-profit status popular doesn’t mean you have to follow that oath.
> This free tier will be subsidized by our enterprise functions
I assume you are not in any way a non-profit organization.
How exactly do you handle hallucinations? Hallucinations need not just be in the citations, right? And what if there are hallucinations without any citations?
How exactly do you handle hallucinations? Hallucinations need not just be in the citations, right? And what if there are hallucinations without any citations?
I’ve been lately trying to build something similar, where did you acquire case law database to build this tool on top?
Part of the value of the incumbents are the case treatment (Sheparidizing) and case issue categories. The world is due for a disruptor, but sadly court data is terrible to get. Bad formats, paygates, slow publishing times, and in some cases physically going to the courthouses
One problem with AI in law is AI's tendency to hallucinate non-existent cases and invent citations. This should be easy to solve and if you've done so, congratulations.