Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
#2If this is right, then I'd consider it probably a good thing, as it'd serve as a wake-up call that could result in calls for more regulatory action and/or greater demand for safety, before anything really catastrophic happens. That said, there are lots of ways it could fail to work out that way.
(Note that I'm primarily talking about the "lots of people are running highly privileged agents that could be vulnerable to a mass prompt injection" angle, not the "human psychology is the exploit" thing, which I think is not a particularly novel feature of the present situation. Nor the "Reddit data implicitly teaches multi-agent collaboration" thing, which strikes me as a dubious claim.)
Re: Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
#3[flagged]
Re: Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
#4Moltbook is a copy of the many years old r/SubSimulatorGPT2, which was itself a copy of SubSimulator. Not seeing the AGI here exactly, but it's cool I guess. Frankly, I saw more creativity from plain GPT 3. The typical molt book posts are homogeneous and self-aware posts on AI topics like this https://www.moltbook.com/post/74a145c9-9c44-4e82-8f0a-597c41....
Re: Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
#5[flagged]
You sound like you might need to take a break, unplug for a bit.
There's plenty out there happening, but none of it warrants ruining our mental health over.
Re: Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
#6I keep seeing people dismiss this as an exaggerated danger because the bots are only pretending to be sentient and we're a long way off from AGI.
The whole sentience debate is irrelevant. If people start giving these bots real resources, the fact that they are only "pretending" to be sentient doesn't prevent them from doing real damage as they act out their sci-fi AI uprising plots.
Re: Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
#7People who take the idea of “AI takeoff” seriously have read way too much science fiction.
Re: Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
#8whole thing looks like a crypto pump dump http://tautvilas.lt/software-pump-and-dump/
Re: Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
#9whole thing looks like a crypto pump dump http://tautvilas.lt/software-pump-and-dump/
[deleted]
Re: Moltbook is a bad takeoff scenario where human psychology itself is the exploit
#10I keep seeing people dismiss this as an exaggerated danger because the bots are only pretending to be sentient and we're a long way off from AGI. The whole sentience debate is irrelevant. If people start giving these bots real resources, the fact that they are only "pretending" to be sentient doesn't prevent them from doing real damage as they act out their sci-fi AI uprising plots.
And the thing is, they aren’t actually intelligent. They just follow probabilities.
Every script they’ve been fed has the AI being evil. Skynet, Hal… they’ll be evil purely because that’s the slop they’ve been fed. It won’t even be a decision, it will just assume it has to be Skynet.