Live data from Hacker News

Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company

amutable.com

1–10 of 770 posts

Re: Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company

#3
post #2

So LP is or has left Microsoft ? >We are building cryptographically verifiable integrity into Linux systems I wonder what that means ? It could be a good thing, but I tend to think it could be a privacy nightmare depending on who controls the keys.

Sounds like kernel mode DRM or some similarly unwanted bullshit.

Re: Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company

#5
post #2

So LP is or has left Microsoft ? >We are building cryptographically verifiable integrity into Linux systems I wonder what that means ? It could be a good thing, but I tend to think it could be a privacy nightmare depending on who controls the keys.

Yes, I have.

Re: Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company

#7
post #2

So LP is or has left Microsoft ? >We are building cryptographically verifiable integrity into Linux systems I wonder what that means ? It could be a good thing, but I tend to think it could be a privacy nightmare depending on who controls the keys.

The events includes a conference title "Remote Attestation of Imutable Operating Systems built on systemd", which is a bit of a clue.

Re: Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company

#9
post #2

So LP is or has left Microsoft ? >We are building cryptographically verifiable integrity into Linux systems I wonder what that means ? It could be a good thing, but I tend to think it could be a privacy nightmare depending on who controls the keys.

Sounds like kernel mode DRM or some similarly unwanted bullshit.

It's probably built on systemd's Secure Boot + immutability support.

As said above, it's about who controls the keys. It's either building your own castle or having to live with the Ultimate TiVo.

We'll see.

Re: Lennart Poettering, Christian Brauner founded a new company

#10
post #2

So LP is or has left Microsoft ? >We are building cryptographically verifiable integrity into Linux systems I wonder what that means ? It could be a good thing, but I tend to think it could be a privacy nightmare depending on who controls the keys.

Sounds like kernel mode DRM or some similarly unwanted bullshit.

> Sounds like kernel mode DRM or some similarly unwanted bullshit.

Look, I hate systemd just as much as the next guy - but how are you getting "DRM" out of this?

Post reply on HN