Data is the only moat
frontierai.substack.com
Data is the only moat
1–10 of 48 posts
Re: Data is the only moat
#2Re: Data is the only moat
#3Information was always the moat for everything. We literally have spies who risk their lives to try to gain access to information.
Re: Data is the only moat
#4inb4 "then why do Meta's models still suck?"
Re: Data is the only moat
#5Information was always the moat for everything. We literally have spies who risk their lives to try to gain access to information.
And guess what, all those mashup companies didn't last a couple of years. Because they didn't have a direct access to data.
Re: Data is the only moat
#6Companies always try to make it seem like data is valuable. Attention is valuable. With attention, you get the data for free. What they monetize is attention. Data is a small part to optimize the sale of ads but attention is the important commodity.
Why else are celebrities so well paid?
Re: Data is the only moat
#7Attention is the only moat. Companies always try to make it seem like data is valuable. Attention is valuable. With attention, you get the data for free. What they monetize is attention. Data is a small part to optimize the sale of ads but attention is the important commodity. Why else are celebrities so well paid?
I feel like the the data to drive the really interesting capabilities (biological, chemical, material, etc, etc, etc) is not going to come in large part from end users.
Re: Data is the only moat
#8Also as foundation models improve, today's "hard to solve" problems become tomorrow's "easy to solve" problems
Re: Data is the only moat
#9Attention is the only moat. Companies always try to make it seem like data is valuable. Attention is valuable. With attention, you get the data for free. What they monetize is attention. Data is a small part to optimize the sale of ads but attention is the important commodity. Why else are celebrities so well paid?
Re: Data is the only moat
#10Attention is the only moat. Companies always try to make it seem like data is valuable. Attention is valuable. With attention, you get the data for free. What they monetize is attention. Data is a small part to optimize the sale of ads but attention is the important commodity. Why else are celebrities so well paid?
User attention to get user data? I feel like the the data to drive the really interesting capabilities (biological, chemical, material, etc, etc, etc) is not going to come in large part from end users.