Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
1–10 of 47 posts
Re: Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
#2Re: Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
#3Re: Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
#4Re: Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
#5Author here if anyone has questions...
Re: Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
#6super cool! i wonder how difficult it would be to recreate the entire chip at logic gate level in, say, VHDL or Verilog
The second problem is that converting the circuitry to Verilog is straightforward, but converting it to usable Verilog is considerably more difficult. If you model the circuit at the transistor level in Verilog, you won't be able to do much with the model. You want a higher-level model, which requires converting the transistors into gates, registers, and so forth. Most of this is easy, but some conversions require a lot of thought.
The next issue is that you would probably want to use the Verilog in an FPGA. A lot of the 8087's circuitry isn't a good match for an FPGA. The 8087 uses a lot of dynamic logic and pass transistors. Things happen on both clock edges, so it will take some work to map it onto edge-trigger flip-flops. Moreover, a key part of the 8087 is the 64-bit shifter, built from bidirectional pass transistors, which would need to be redesigned, probably with a bunch of logic gates.
The result is that you'd end up more-or-less reimplementing the 8087 rather than simply translating it to Verilog.
Re: Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
#7Author here if anyone has questions...
Is there 8087 IP available in verilog etc?
Re: Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
#8super cool! i wonder how difficult it would be to recreate the entire chip at logic gate level in, say, VHDL or Verilog
It would be difficult, but not impossible. The main problem is tracing out all the circuitry, which is very time-consuming and error-prone. Trust me on this :-) The second problem is that converting the circuitry to Verilog is straightforward, but converting it to usable Verilog is considerably more difficult. If you model the circuit at the transistor level in Verilog, you won't be able to do much with the model. Yo…
Re: Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would be difficult, but not impossible. The main problem is tracing out all the circuitry, which is very time-consuming and error-prone. Trust me on this :-) The second problem is that converting the circuitry to Verilog is straightforward, but converting it to usable Verilog is considerably more difficult. If you model the circuit at the transistor level in Verilog, you won't be able to do much with the model. Yo…
ah, i see, thanks for the insight! do you have any advice on how one might get started with IC reverse-engineering? i think it would be interesting to reimplement these chips in a way that's at least inspired by the original design
I also have a video from Hackaday Supercon on reverse engineering chips: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKi1xX7KKOI
Re: Conditions in the Intel 8087 floating-point chip's microcode
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there 8087 IP available in verilog etc?
As far as I know, you can't get the 8087 itself as an IP block. You can get generic IEEE-754 floating-point as an IP block, e.g. from AMD: https://www.amd.com/en/products/adaptive-socs-and-fpgas/inte...