We're all just content for ICE

IMO green accounts with negative points should be assumed to be trolls or agitators. Engaging is a waste of time; just flag if you’ve got the power and move on without a second thought. (I think I’ve been shadowbanned from flagging. What a fucking site, eh?)

Re: We're all just content for ICE

#8

Post by woggy » Tue, Jan 13, 2026, 12:42 AM UTC

tastyface wrote: post #7

woggy wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you denying that this is happening?

IMO green accounts with negative points should be assumed to be trolls or agitators. Engaging is a waste of time; just flag if you’ve got the power and move on without a second thought. (I think I’ve been shadowbanned from flagging. What a fucking site, eh?)

What is a green account?

Re: We're all just content for ICE

#9

Post by tastyface » Tue, Jan 13, 2026, 12:44 AM UTC

woggy wrote: post #8

tastyface wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMO green accounts with negative points should be assumed to be trolls or agitators. Engaging is a waste of time; just flag if you’ve got the power and move on without a second thought. (I think I’ve been shadowbanned from flagging. What a fucking site, eh?)

What is a green account?

If the username is colored green, I believe it means the account was created recently.

Re: We're all just content for ICE

#10

Post by jacobthesnakob » Tue, Jan 13, 2026, 12:46 AM UTC

woggy wrote: post #6

jacobthesnakob wrote: post #4

You’re all just content for internet outrage bait.

Are you denying that this is happening?

[flagged]