Live data from Hacker News

European Commission issues call for evidence on open source

lwn.net

1–10 of 380 posts

Re: European Commission issues call for evidence on open source

#4
post #3

To me this is the most amazing thing people that would turn themselves inside out against communism/socialism because of the lies they have been told. When it actually comes down to it are all for communism ie open source

I would argue open source is decentralization and proprietary is centralization.

In other words, open source is libertarianism and proprietary is communism.

And this move is to move from Big Tech/"Big State" to smaller alternatives.

Re: European Commission issues call for evidence on open source

#5
post #3

To me this is the most amazing thing people that would turn themselves inside out against communism/socialism because of the lies they have been told. When it actually comes down to it are all for communism ie open source

Just because it's free? Let's talk again when all open source projects are funded and controlled by the state with zero competition between them and no consumer choice. Only one Linux distro, only one database, only one web framework, etc. And it's decided top-down from the state what to work on. I doubt though that these projects would have started in the first place in a communist setting.

Re: European Commission issues call for evidence on open source

#6
post #3

To me this is the most amazing thing people that would turn themselves inside out against communism/socialism because of the lies they have been told. When it actually comes down to it are all for communism ie open source

I would argue open source is decentralization and proprietary is centralization. In other words, open source is libertarianism and proprietary is communism. And this move is to move from Big Tech/"Big State" to smaller alternatives.

> proprietary is communism.

Maybe we should not twist ourselves to logical pretzels to redefine terms like that.

Re: European Commission issues call for evidence on open source

#7
post #5
post #3

To me this is the most amazing thing people that would turn themselves inside out against communism/socialism because of the lies they have been told. When it actually comes down to it are all for communism ie open source

Just because it's free? Let's talk again when all open source projects are funded and controlled by the state with zero competition between them and no consumer choice. Only one Linux distro, only one database, only one web framework, etc. And it's decided top-down from the state what to work on. I doubt though that these projects would have started in the first place in a communist setting.

"The" state, with no competition, like there's only one state?

Belgium isn't big enough to realistically have its own linux, but France and Germany are.

Re: European Commission issues call for evidence on open source

#9
post #3

To me this is the most amazing thing people that would turn themselves inside out against communism/socialism because of the lies they have been told. When it actually comes down to it are all for communism ie open source

Open source is not communism. Communism would entail that we collectively own Linux, which we don't. It's private property, and if we want to use the code, we need to abide by its licensing terms. Licensing terms that are built upon the existence of copyright, a concept that allows for private ownership of intellectual property.

Re: European Commission issues call for evidence on open source

#10
post #5
post #3

To me this is the most amazing thing people that would turn themselves inside out against communism/socialism because of the lies they have been told. When it actually comes down to it are all for communism ie open source

Just because it's free? Let's talk again when all open source projects are funded and controlled by the state with zero competition between them and no consumer choice. Only one Linux distro, only one database, only one web framework, etc. And it's decided top-down from the state what to work on. I doubt though that these projects would have started in the first place in a communist setting.

There is no reason such a state would have to set things up this way.

As an example: you probably know that germany has socialized healthcare. It is, however, not implemented as a single-payer model. Instead there are tons of different insurances competing with each other, while having a highly regulated floor of what they MUST offer.

Is the model perfect? Hell no, it has tons of issues - though overall it's pretty solid. My point is just that social policies and "no internal competition ever" does absolutely not have to go hand in hand. There is a massive middle ground.

See: social democracy as a concept and in its current implementation.

Post reply on HN