Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol

fontgenerator.design

1–10 of 87 posts

Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol

#1
I’m building a Unicode reference where each symbol has its own dev-friendly page with all relevant encodings.

Example: [https://fontgenerator.design/symbol/almost-equal-to](https://fontgenerator.design/symbol/almost-equal-to)

Includes Unicode, HTML, CSS, JS, UTF-8/16 bytes, URL encoding, and usage examples.

The same structure is used across thousands of symbols (math, arrows, currency, tech/UI, punctuation).

Built because existing references are fragmented. Feedback welcome.

Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol
fontgenerator.design

Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol

#4

Planning to add more symbol-specific notes (confusables, common pitfalls, rendering quirks). Curious what details people usually look for but can’t find.

I don't know how to find the ideal font for the missing glyph on my environment which is BSD.

Using the `unicode' command from plan9userspace, for example

   unicode 2ff0-2fff
the last three symbols are shown inside emacs as squares with the four hex values inside.

Typing in the search field `2fff' finds `no match found'.

Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol

#5

Planning to add more symbol-specific notes (confusables, common pitfalls, rendering quirks). Curious what details people usually look for but can’t find.

I don't know how to find the ideal font for the missing glyph on my environment which is BSD. Using the `unicode' command from plan9userspace, for example unicode 2ff0-2fff the last three symbols are shown inside emacs as squares with the four hex values inside. Typing in the search field `2fff' finds `no match found'.

Good catch — I just pushed an update based on this.

The symbols search now supports code-point lookup, so you can search by:

U+2FFF

0x2FFF

plain hex (2fff, 4–6 digits)

This makes it possible to jump straight to a symbol page even when the glyph doesn’t render locally and you only have the code point (like the Emacs/BSD case you described).

One limitation to note: some symbols aren’t covered by common or default system fonts, so they may still appear as tofu boxes depending on the font stack. That’s a font coverage issue rather than Unicode itself.

Appreciate you calling this out — this was exactly the kind of workflow gap I wanted to catch.

Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol

#7
> We use cookies and similar technologies for analytics (Google Analytics) and session recording (Microsoft Clarity). Ads may be enabled in the future (Google AdSense). By continuing to use this site, you acknowledge this notice. You can manage cookies in your browser settings. EU/UK users: this serves as our cookie notice.

No. Please just give me an option to reject all tracking cookies instead of just kicking me in the face with a done deal.

Whoever wrote this 'EU/UK users: this serves as our cookie notice' is ignorant of the actual law. Have a look at:

https://gdpr.eu/cookies/

Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol

#8
I’m looking at the currency block. Each box has a colored “drop shadow”. I spent a minute or so trying to figure out what the significance of the color is. Finally, I noticed that the color appears to cycle between cyan, magenta, and yellow. Is this a design element only, or do the colors actually have some meaning with respect to the symbol?

Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol

#9

I’m looking at the currency block. Each box has a colored “drop shadow”. I spent a minute or so trying to figure out what the significance of the color is. Finally, I noticed that the color appears to cycle between cyan, magenta, and yellow. Is this a design element only, or do the colors actually have some meaning with respect to the symbol?

Not the author, but it seems to be only stylistic
Post reply on HN