The Peptide Craze
erictopol.substack.com
The Peptide Craze
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: The Peptide Craze
#2The medical field has a terrible problem in terms of literature reproducibility and ethics. The beta blocker scandal is a great example.
Re: The Peptide Craze
#3Why would WADA ban things for which there is no evidence that they do anything?
Re: The Peptide Craze
#4> The most important column is the last one—there is no evidence from randomized trials in humans that any of these peptides provide the benefits that are advocated. As seen below, two of the peptides have been prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Why would WADA ban things for which there is no evidence that they do anything?
1. It has the potential to enhance sport performance. (potential -> a theoretical mechanism, even if unproven)
2. It represents an actual or potential health risk to the athlete.
3. It violates the spirit of sport.
Most of these peptides haven't passed adequate human safety trials, and their long term side effect profile is unknown. Additionally, an attempt at using anything to gain an unfair advantage violates the spirit of sport, even if the effect is placebo or even negative.Re: The Peptide Craze
#5Safety issues, perhaps. Fragments from digestion might look like smaller things which do something (bad). There's a whole lot that's not known re: biological mechanisms. The fact that drug design has worked this well is impressive.
Re: The Peptide Craze
#6The whole peptide hype is very interesting and I can’t wait until well studied cheap over the counter options hit the market.
Re: The Peptide Craze
#7Re: The Peptide Craze
#8Ah yes, thousands of people benefiting from cheap and effective drugs that can’t be patented because they naturally occur. Of course it doesn’t work. /sarcasm The medical field has a terrible problem in terms of literature reproducibility and ethics. The beta blocker scandal is a great example.
I'm all in favor of well designed studies. Not so fond of gatekeeping.