No post body was provided.
Untitled topic
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: undefined
#2[deleted]
Re: undefined
#3ChatGPT claims a lot of things. Is there any evidence this isn’t a hallucination?
Re: undefined
#4ChatGPT claims a lot of things. Is there any evidence this isn’t a hallucination?
OP modestly claims
> I am the word-best expert in general topology
and many other hilarious things on their GH profile. Judge for yourself :)
Re: undefined
#5The FrontierMath benchmark ranks models on math problem performance.
How can other leading math and coding models test your solution?
Write unit tests [with pytest] which assert that the predictive error is within a reasonable tolerance
Notes re: Navier-Stokes from "Google DeepMind team up to solve the Navier-Stokes million-dollar problem": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44383829 :
> Shouldn't solving NS also solve for n-body gravity?
From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46017130 :
>>> "Perihelion precession of planetary orbits solved from quantum field theory" (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14447 .. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45220460
>> Planetary orbits are an n-body problem. GR, SQG [GR, Gross-Pitaevskii, Navier-Stokes,], and Gravity from QFT solve for planetary orbits
Re: undefined
#6ChatGPT claims a lot of things. Is there any evidence this isn’t a hallucination?
OP modestly claims > I am the word-best expert in general topology and many other hilarious things on their GH profile. Judge for yourself :)
At least they didn’t claim to invent AGI this time from prompts only… lol