MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
#2Re: MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
#3Re: MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
#4> MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
Trying to keep the bubble alive
Re: MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
#5Title is wildliy misleading, check.
Its been apparent for a while now that the only yaysayers left either are CEOs or just havent tried the tech yet.
Re: MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
#6Wildly misreported headline
>The Index measures where AI systems overlap with the skills used in each occupation. A score reflects the share of wage value linked to skills where current AI systems show technical capability. For example, a score of 12% means AI overlaps with skills representing 12% of that occupation’s wage value, not 12% of jobs. This reflects skill overlap, not job displacement.
>The Index reports technical skill overlap with AI. It does not estimate job loss, workforce reductions, adoption timelines or net employment effects.
Re: MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
#7So? That is nothing compared to tractors, steam engines, automated looms.
Re: MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
#8Didn't MIT also publish a similar report saying most AI implementations don't add any value, or something similar?
Re: MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
#9Not 11.6%, not 11.8%, but 11.7%.
Re: MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI
#10It's basically an ad