Live data from Hacker News

The Google Trends Spike Before the D.C. Shooting Raises New Questions

allenanalysis.com

1–10 of 17 posts

Re: The Google Trends Spike Before the D.C. Shooting Raises New Questions

#3
I wish this had a bit more technical information, because I don't think I learned much here other than some people are looking into it, and apparently shouldn't subpoena IPs or anything.

Is there a time zone misalignment, perhaps? If it's one or two searches, could it be the shooter searching their own name? Unless there's a clear technical reason showing these to be artifactual, why is a subpoena premature?

Re: The Google Trends Spike Before the D.C. Shooting Raises New Questions

#8
post #5

This does not currently show up on Google Trends, so unless you're trying to go full conspiracy mode here I don't see why we should trust this random screenshot to be accurate: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%207-d&geo=...

If you change the region, it does show up.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%207-d&geo=...

Re: The Google Trends Spike Before the D.C. Shooting Raises New Questions

#9
post #8
post #5

This does not currently show up on Google Trends, so unless you're trying to go full conspiracy mode here I don't see why we should trust this random screenshot to be accurate: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%207-d&geo=...

If you change the region, it does show up. https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%207-d&geo=...

Are you in a different timezone?

I an in EST and do not see any traffic before 7pm Nov 26 EST.

I can confirm I am seeing data in EST time because the latest data available is from 20 mins ago in EST.

Re: The Google Trends Spike Before the D.C. Shooting Raises New Questions

#10
May not be related with this in particular, but how many names that are not tied to any shooting or whatever appear in low activity google trends? It could happen with most names around the region where you live, i.e. related with spam campaigns, AI searches, people curious about people in their neighbourhood or whatever that covers most of the people? If it is something common giving a reasonable time frame before a given moment, it could be a coincidence that may not be so rare. Checking only backwards for a particular event and not doing the check forward to see if that is unusual is a missing link there.
Post reply on HN