German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
annalist.noblogs.org
German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
#2Re: German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
#3- monitoring implies that they are doing it constantly, but they are only allowed to do it for evidence on suspicion
- providers of telecommunication stuff (telephone, email, etc.) have to provide possibilites for the government to get IP addresses, places, logins and more
Re: German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
#4Regarding Skype, it is important to notice that the German authorities apparently use trojans to intercept Skype conversations. I am surprised that Skype in spite of its HQ in Europe apparently still doesn't offer direct access for authorities.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/skype-makes-c...
Re: German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
#5(Apart from that this is not really news, I could have told you month ago if you asked me ;)
Re: German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
#6What drives me mad is ALL OF THIS was paid by federal taxes (not so sure about the 'Billion Euros', but most likely a lot) and all they got was something close to NetBus/SubSeven/Back Orifice (last one developed in 1998!!!). Digitask (a complete joke) is still employed by us and sadly (or maybe luckily) there has been happening not much since then on that front. Politicians keep blaming somebody else and apparently NOBODY outside Digitask has EVER had the chance to analyze the original source code of it (which is in itself a complete hoax). Best of it all, apparently, this entire 'program' has so far not yielded a SINGLE success story.
Re: German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
#7Linkbait? Nothing really new here, they 'released' their trojan a while ago, it's been found 'in the wild', the CCC disassembled it. They found MAJOR problems within it, e.g. crypto was a joke. They actually released their own control tool for it [1](GERMAN). Then they found the 'update' capability which basically allowed a loyal servant (or an attacker) to upload and execute whatever they choose to do so. What drive…
Of course, this isn't anything new for some audience, but I think that is an indipendent media blog, so the story can still fit its audience.
Re: German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
#8Linkbait? Nothing really new here, they 'released' their trojan a while ago, it's been found 'in the wild', the CCC disassembled it. They found MAJOR problems within it, e.g. crypto was a joke. They actually released their own control tool for it [1](GERMAN). Then they found the 'update' capability which basically allowed a loyal servant (or an attacker) to upload and execute whatever they choose to do so. What drive…
As noblogs.org is completely no-profit, and anonymous as much as possible, and does not contain ads, linkbait is not an option :) Of course, this isn't anything new for some audience , but I think that is an indipendent media blog, so the story can still fit its audience.
Re: German government answers questions about contracts to build monitoring software
#9Linkbait? Nothing really new here, they 'released' their trojan a while ago, it's been found 'in the wild', the CCC disassembled it. They found MAJOR problems within it, e.g. crypto was a joke. They actually released their own control tool for it [1](GERMAN). Then they found the 'update' capability which basically allowed a loyal servant (or an attacker) to upload and execute whatever they choose to do so. What drive…