Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
1–10 of 62 posts
Re: Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
#2[flagged]
Re: Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
#3[flagged]
Are you saying you reject the use of "we" for any group that doesn't include you?
Re: Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
#4Re: Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
#5[flagged]
I'd assume most French would be happy with "France detected Lightning on Mars"
I read the title as equivalent to "Humanity detected Lightning on Mars", which I'm also perfectly happy with
Re: Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
#6[flagged]
I'd assume most French would be happy with "France detected Lightning on Mars" I read the title as equivalent to "Humanity detected Lightning on Mars", which I'm also perfectly happy with
I did not think much of the title before reading the parent comment as I also read "humanity", but now it's the lack of consistency and double standards that annoy me. "France detected Lightning on Mars", fine, let's stop cutting the funding of public research so we can keep on saying we. Also let's title "We released GPT-5", "We landed a rocket on a barge".
Re: Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
#7[flagged]
[deleted]
Re: Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
#8Re: Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
#9Does that mean Mars' ground is electrically charged (positively or negatively) or what?
Re: Detection of triboelectric discharges during dust events on Mars
#10[flagged]
I assume you're downvoted for pedantry (understandable) but it is a real pattern. Whenever it's a space topic it's always "we" or "Japan" or "America". Nobody is so vague on other topics. I suspect it's a throwback to the Cold War space race when the major players did flights in a geopolitical context. If the institute's name is very long, like here, maybe "Scientists detected ..." or "Researchers ..."