Live data from Hacker News

A monopoly ISP refuses to fix upstream infrastructure

sacbear.com

1–10 of 361 posts

Re: A monopoly ISP refuses to fix upstream infrastructure

#4

This has to be the weirdest post I've seen in a while? Cable infrastructure in the US is awful. I can't imagine a scenario where it would be reliable.

I don’t think it was the author’s intent to shock us by the state of CATV infrastructure.

Re: A monopoly ISP refuses to fix upstream infrastructure

#5
I’ve dealt with this at least twice on behalf of clients. In both cases, another provider entering the market was the only thing that made a difference. By that point, they’d already burned all the good will they had in the area, so maybe they would have fixed things with competition, but I wouldn’t know, my clients got on the waitlist to jump ship the absolute nanosecond they hear about it.

Re: A monopoly ISP refuses to fix upstream infrastructure

#7

This has to be the weirdest post I've seen in a while? Cable infrastructure in the US is awful. I can't imagine a scenario where it would be reliable.

Yeah its pretty weird I created a website just to write this article just so I could make this post. I'm so frustrated with these outages :(

Re: A monopoly ISP refuses to fix upstream infrastructure

#8

> Xfinity is the only gigabit provider in this area. No competition. No alternatives. I can’t leave. So they don’t have to care. many such cases...

"only gigabit provider". Like those grow on trees. Lots of people would love to have a fraction of that speed.

Re: A monopoly ISP refuses to fix upstream infrastructure

#10
If OP is reading this, try downgrading to a Docsis 3.0 modem. Docsis 3.1 in Comcast’s deployed infrastructure has severe repeating outage issues when there’s a cracked line somewhere allowing RF leakage into it, that cause a partial 3.1 reset but have no effect on 3.0.
Post reply on HN