CSScomb

#1

Post by willfarrell » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 10:04 AM UTC

CSScomb
csscomb.com

Re: CSScomb

#2

Post by cburgmer » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 11:47 AM UTC

Seriously, PHP? Integrating that into your favorite editor?

Anyways. A tool to help you have clean CSS sounds cool.

Re: CSScomb

#3

Post by Adirael » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 12:07 PM UTC

cburgmer wrote: post #2

Seriously, PHP? Integrating that into your favorite editor? Anyways. A tool to help you have clean CSS sounds cool.

Ins't PHP still the most used language for WebApps?

Re: CSScomb

#4

Post by camwest » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 12:40 PM UTC

I just ran it on a particularly rank LESS document and it worked great. Nice tool.

Re: CSScomb

#5

Post by xentronium » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 12:45 PM UTC

cburgmer wrote: post #2

Seriously, PHP? Integrating that into your favorite editor? Anyways. A tool to help you have clean CSS sounds cool.

How is php worse than perl or ruby for scripting?

Re: CSScomb

#6

Post by nachteilig » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 2:03 PM UTC

xentronium wrote: post #5

cburgmer wrote: post #2

Seriously, PHP? Integrating that into your favorite editor? Anyways. A tool to help you have clean CSS sounds cool.

How is php worse than perl or ruby for scripting?

God. Please don't start this again. This discussion is really no different than the vim vs emacs of old.

Re: CSScomb

#7

Post by juddlyon » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 2:22 PM UTC

Cool service! Worked great on the stylesheet I tested.

You might consider describing the service and benefits on the page you process the file on. I wasn't sure what the service did immediately.

Re: CSScomb

#8

Post by brian_c » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 2:28 PM UTC

Sort alphabetically. It's not arbitrary, everybody understands it, and no tool needed. This is silly.

Re: CSScomb

#9

Post by kyriakos » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 2:36 PM UTC

xentronium wrote: post #5

cburgmer wrote: post #2

Seriously, PHP? Integrating that into your favorite editor? Anyways. A tool to help you have clean CSS sounds cool.

How is php worse than perl or ruby for scripting?

its a matter of preference. whatever gets your work done easier use it.

Re: CSScomb

#10

Post by debacle » Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 2:38 PM UTC

I'd like to see a version of this that could be created as a build task or a git hook.