ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
mcphersonindustries.com
ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
#2I'd welcome any feedback on how to better present interesting data, or answer any questions. Thanks!
Re: ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
#3Did this for fun mostly to test out casper.js (it's nice!) I'd welcome any feedback on how to better present interesting data, or answer any questions. Thanks!
Re: ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
#4Re: ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
#5I just learned something new for example today - using the ".dir-locals.el" to specify per-directory variables :)
I want to learn vi/vim, but spent already so much time learning emacs (and still feeling baby in it... which is good!)
Re: ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
#6Did this for fun mostly to test out casper.js (it's nice!) I'd welcome any feedback on how to better present interesting data, or answer any questions. Thanks!
Re: ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
#7Re: ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
#8Did this for fun mostly to test out casper.js (it's nice!) I'd welcome any feedback on how to better present interesting data, or answer any questions. Thanks!
It may be a simple and trivial question to some, but more importantly, I think the methodology was very well done because I feel can trust your results, which should be the goal of ANY empirical analysis.
Re: ShowHN: Scraped 800 .vimrc files from github, analyzed for fun
#9Would love to see something similar for "emacs" I just learned something new for example today - using the ".dir-locals.el" to specify per-directory variables :) I want to learn vi/vim, but spent already so much time learning emacs (and still feeling baby in it... which is good!)
Nobody has really mastered Emacs. Nobody.
There's simply too much detail, much of it hidden in the shadows.